<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Workflow on Draft</title><link>https://draft.caps.is/tags/workflow/</link><description>Recent content in Workflow on Draft</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 14:13:23 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://draft.caps.is/tags/workflow/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How I use Claude Code on OVMS</title><link>https://draft.caps.is/posts/how-i-use-claude-code-on-ovms/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 14:13:23 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://draft.caps.is/posts/how-i-use-claude-code-on-ovms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The OVMS development manual has a section on AI. It&amp;rsquo;s worth reading in full, but the short version:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Vibe&amp;rdquo; submissions will be rejected and closed without comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Submitting unvalidated &amp;ldquo;AI&amp;rdquo; output is a waste of our time and an insult to our dedication to the Open Source idea of sharing knowledge and helping each other to grow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The maintainer isn&amp;rsquo;t wrong. The PRs he&amp;rsquo;s seen from people pointing an LLM at the repo and submitting whatever comes out are, by his account, consistently bad — wrong function calls, invented APIs, code that compiles but misunderstands how the framework actually works. OVMS is a custom embedded environment running on ESP32. It has its own event system, its own metric types, its own CAN poller, its own naming conventions. Nothing in an LLM&amp;rsquo;s training data maps cleanly onto it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>